Jump to content

User talk:Shmitra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Barnstars
User_talk:Shmitra/Archive 1
User_talk:Shmitra/Archive 2


hi

[edit]

Do take a look at Razakars (Pakistan). The page needs some tidying up.Bakaman 19:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See this

[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anil Chowdhury and comment. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Can you please provide some book reference in the Anil Chowdhury article? May be that would be useful. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 04:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Almost any book on Ray will do. I don't think there's a book on Choudhury himself.--ppm 05:40, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Your note

[edit]

Sure! I am also very interested in his works. I will help when I see there is some thing missing. I will look through it again when I am done with my current project (Kiarostami). Take care. Sangak 19:58, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

[edit]

I didn't specify at the Talk page because the template was a specific one: weasel words. The article contains many instances. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 20:42, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From the lead: "who is widely regarded as one of the greatest auteurs of 20th century cinema." (by whom?)
"generally considered his magnum opus." (by whom?)
"that some thought would kill off the film when it was released in the United States" (who thought this?)
"others find it remarkably slow even by Ray's standards" (who do?)
"many saw striking similarities in the film to Ray's earlier script" (who did?)
"Featuring a musical structure some commentators feel is even more complex than Charulata" (which commentators?)
etc., etc. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Summaries

[edit]
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

--Mel Etitis (Talk) 23:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

[edit]

Happy Holi !!--Dwaipayan (talk)

Great work on merging the two! I am not getting enough time these days. Will try to lend a hand ASAP. Meanwhile please continue. Geography is lacking in content. The rest, content-wise, seems better. However, style (merging of WB and BD) needs improvement. Hope we shall be able place it in FAC soon. Needs a daughter article on culture I guess. Can you try to curb the History? Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Rajshahi

[edit]

Thanks for bringing it to my attention. My work has mostly been in categorization lately, and cleaning up the Indian Americans cat. Btw, if you need that infobox, I'll try and finish it in a couple of days.Bakaman 00:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject History of Bangladesh has started. It needs members and participants. Aditya Kabir 03:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

I have gone through the article on Rajshahi University, though not in detail but tried to touch each section. I found this article as one of the best written article on Bangladeshi Universities. Its really hard to comment on this article as it is really cool. Still giving some opinions, may be it will help you to improve the article further.

  • Is it 'Northern Bangladesh' or North Bangle? I lived in Rajshahi for several years. At that time it was called North Bangle or Uttor Bongo.
  • I think name of the 'Vice-chancellor' should be placed just after the name of the Chancellor.
  • A separate point can be arranged with a title like "Rajshahi University and Bangladesh Liberation War" or something like that. The reason why I am emphasizing on this point is RU has a very strong participation in our Liberation war along with DU. So, such a special point can strengthen the article at a great extend.

Regards, (Niaz bd 08:35, 14 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

The reason northern Bangladesh is more appropriate is that this article is written for the typical enlish language reader. Using North Bengal would necessiate the introduction of the confusing concept of Bengal vs Bangladesh. The vice-chancellor thing is a formatting problem, I tried to put it in place, still haven't been able to make it work. The liberation war idea is good, though some of it can be in the History section. It is also important to remember the first point I mentioned, that from an external point of view, Rajshahi University is a seat of education, and as such, that's deserves most encyclopedic attention.--ppm 20:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I do agree and appreciate the term Northern Bangladesh instead of North Bangle. I actually didn't think in that way. Regarding VC issue, I suggest you to copy a suitable box from a reputed article and replace the filed by appropriate data. In East West University page, I applied exactly this technique. About liberation war issue, I have seen other universities use to put lots of history in the mail article as they consider it as a part of the university history. Still this article is quite strong and if you add liberation war issues also then it will strengthen the article at a great extend. Over all, nice job dude! Regards, Niaz bd 07:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rajshahi University

[edit]

You're doing great work improving the prose of this article! MarkBuckles (talk) 06:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BUET

[edit]

Once you are done with the RU article, can you take a look at BUET? The article is sub-standard, and full of fluff. I also am prod'ing List of notable BUET alumni as the article is simply a list of buet alumnus in academia, without any notability considerations. --Ragib 05:15, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have started working on the article Education in Bangladesh. It was in an extremely bad shape. The last few edits were turning it into a motley hotchpotch of text, link and image for private university/English medium agenda-pushers. Even without that the article had little content. I have began by putting in an enormous amount of fresh text, and even more massive amount of resource links (Banglapedia, government sites and downloadable pdf links). Now the real work should begin. Would you lend a hand in this? I can't do it alone. Do you have anyone else in mind who might help? That person doesn't need to be Bangladeshi. Aditya Kabir 18:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC) - please, answer to my talk page[reply]

Re: Not totally sure about your points

[edit]

Hey, that's alright. You don't have to go out looking for difficult to obtain information. It would have been nice if we could put in some stuff on the 1980s disturbances. It should not hinder the article from getting an FA status. A lot of FAs need some more work, and yes, some do get worked on even after getting the status. I can't exactly recall which of them I've encountered, but am willing to dig up some if the cause for RU demands it. Just one questions, can you put the JMB controversy somewhere? The information is available online. Cheers, and nice job. I wish I had your help in the two projects I am tied in with now - Shahbag and Education in Bangladesh. Cheers again. Aditya Kabir 18:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A question: Will be too much if I ask you to put in publication dates on all of the refrences (on on as many possible) for RU? Aditya Kabir 20:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulaions for the super-human job you've done to Rajshahi University. WOW! Simple amazing. Aditya Kabir 16:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on the FA.Bakaman 01:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Original Barnstar
Please, have this barnstar for your outstanding contribution in bringing Rajshahi University to FA status. Awesome, simply awesome. Cheers. Aditya Kabir 16:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Peer Review

[edit]

You are most welcome to put one of the articles up for peer review. I'd suggest you do that for Shahbag, the education article is still too weak for that. May be in a week or so you can put that up for a review as well. Cheers. Aditya Kabir 16:32, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Post Script: I take that back. Since I, too, am running short on time nowdays. Would you rather put Grameen Bank up for review? I have already submitted it as a GA nominee. But, it still needs a lot of work. The nomination was quite premature. Aditya Kabir 16:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Hi! The success of RU has inspired me to do something similar with CU! I'm short of time these days, may be later. I'll be waiting for your return so that Bengal can be moved further. Meanwhile, I'll do minor stuffs there if possible. Maybe I'll knock somebody for a better map, if possible a multicoloured map (showing the present extent and atleast one historical extent eg Bengal Presidency). Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Session Backlogs

[edit]

Congratulations on FA! I piped session to academic term. Might be nice to create a wiktionary entry for backlog, but it seems to be common parlance for English; the phrase is just foreign to American English. Hopefully the pipe will clarify anyway. Best wishes, MarkBuckles (talk) 09:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have just put the article to peer review. Would you care to take a look? Aditya Kabir 20:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Shahbag review

[edit]

Yes, I agree that the Urban Layout and Civic Life parts are a bit mixed up. Can you lead me to some examples I can take hints from? May be, on top of that, you can explain what can be done a bit more. I need help on this. Cheers. Aditya Kabir 14:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greek to me

[edit]

Greetings. I just wrote the page Greek to me. I am comparing similar expressions in other languages. I was wondering if you would be able to add the expression in any languages with which you are comfortable. Btw, I just found your page/profile by running a search for users who have a level 4/level 5 ability in non-English languages. Thanks much! samwaltz 04:52, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The FAC of Lage Raho... has started. Please drop by if you are interested. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FAC

[edit]

Hi - I have submitted Language movement for FAC. I request your input at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Language movement. Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy) 19:41, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

[edit]
WikiProject on History of Bangladesh Please accept this invite to join the Bangladesh History Workgroup, a subproject dedicated to improving Bangladesh history related articles.
To join, simply click here and add your name to the bottom of the list! Aditya Kabir 14:52, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

[edit]

Hi Shmitra bhayia, a new project has just started, Wikipedia:WikiProject Bangladeshi Universities. Feel free to participate there.Thank you--NAHID 06:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FAC:The Language Movement

[edit]

Language Movement have improved exceedingly well under the observation of Dwaipayan. But at the moment, he is too busy to contribute. So please provide any last minute help that you can offer. Thanks -Tarif from Bangladesh 19:22, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article that you created needs references for verifiability and additional context to help others who read the article to understand what this person did. Thanks,--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 20:34, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sandesh.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sandesh.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:00, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DeviPoster.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:DeviPoster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you around? Satyajit Ray was nominated for main page appearance. However, one oppose hascome mentioning the lack of inline citations. Since the article is very much basedon Robinson's book, I guess most cases are citable from the book. Can you insert a few more inline citations?--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I am trying to insert some citations, using the google book. Bye the way, are you there in New haven? I am soon moving to UConn, at Farmington and Hartford.--Dwaipayan (talk) 07:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
yes that would be great. I loved NYC during my short stay there. NYC is so much like Calcutta or Bombay...--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:53, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rajshahi University

[edit]

Rajshahi University has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.

WikiProject films peer review of Pather Panchali

[edit]

Pather Panchali, an Indian film directed by Satyajit Ray, is one of the Core articles in wikiproject film. The article is at the WikiProject Films' peer review section here. Please provide inputs. Thanks a lot. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 12:51, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bengali language FAR

[edit]

Bengali language has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 03:11, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Shmitra,
the image Image:Taslima nasrin.jpg has been uploaded to Commons. Though you wrote "Free use allowed by author.", we wonder who is actually the author/photographer of the image. --Túrelio (talk) 08:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:KamrulYahya.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:KamrulYahya.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:40, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Quamrul nayar.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Quamrul nayar.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Auteur

[edit]

The word auteur was deliberately removed from the lead, due to the advice in the WikiProject Film Peer review. Auteur is a somewhat controversial word, that's the reason, despite having references. And, the sentence reads as if winning Cannes established him as an auteur.--Dwaipayan (talk) 02:24, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Shmitra! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 56 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Hemayet Uddin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Shakti Chattopadhyay - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Joy Goswami - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Hanif Sanket - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Abedin1971painting.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Abedin1971painting.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:28, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh FAR nom

[edit]

I have nominated Bangladesh for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- Cirt (talk) 05:10, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:02 abani bari2.ogg missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:02 abani bari2.ogg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:55, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:02 abani bari2.ogg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:02 abani bari2.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:12, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Apu Pather1.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Apu Pather1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 12:39, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Taslima nasrin.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Taslima nasrin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rosenzweig (talk) 15:46, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hungry generation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough coverage, nor online neither print media, of the subject. No references cited here. Seems to be OR or COI by either subject sock or near relations.

Summary: Not notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. » nafSadh did say 17:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force

[edit]

. Vensatry (Ping me) 10:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:RebelCowAbedin.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RebelCowAbedin.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mahapurush has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable according to WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shubhrojeet (talk) 10:11, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Subir Banerjee

[edit]

The article Subir Banerjee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only one film role. WP:ONEEVENT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk) 01:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Begum Sufia KamalMM.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Begum Sufia KamalMM.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:29, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for editing Rajshahi College

[edit]

Hi {Ping|Shmitra} I've noticed your edit on Rajshahi College page for many times. I just came to thank you for your contribution on that page. You are invited to visit Rajshahi College physically. I will be your host here. --Nahid Hossain (talk) 05:14, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Sultan painting.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Bangla extent.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:BanglaNak1.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BanglaNak1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]